New Jersey petitions Supreme Court to decide: states or CFTC regulate prediction markets
New Jersey's Attorney General and gaming authorities filed a petition for a writ of certiorari asking the US Supreme Court to resolve conflicting appeals-court rulings on whether states or the federal CFTC regulate prediction-market sports products. The petition centers on Kalshi's offering of sporting event contracts to New Jersey residents.
New Jersey's Attorney General and gaming authorities filed a petition for a writ of certiorari to the US Supreme Court on September 2, asking the Court to resolve whether states or the federal CFTC have authority to regulate prediction-market sports products. The petition marks the first state-led effort to bring the question before SCOTUS, according to CoinDesk's reporting.
The case centers on Kalshi, which has offered sporting event contracts to New Jersey residents. The petition comes as multiple appeals courts have issued conflicting rulings on whether states can crack down on prediction markets' sports offerings, creating legal uncertainty that the petitioners argue requires the Supreme Court's intervention.
Kalshi has contended that it cannot be regulated by 50 different state regulators, according to Cointelegraph's reporting. The company's position frames the stakes: a state-by-state regulatory regime would splinter the market, while federal CFTC authority would establish a uniform national standard.
Neither CoinDesk nor Cointelegraph reported the CFTC's formal position on the jurisdictional question or named the specific federal agencies participating in the New Jersey filing.
New Jersey is the first state to petition SCOTUS on whether states or the CFTC control prediction-market regulation, a question that has split federal appeals courts.
The Supreme Court's decision whether to grant certiorari will determine whether prediction-market platforms face 50 separate state regulators or a single federal regime. If SCOTUS takes the case, a ruling for New Jersey would empower states to impose their own restrictions; a ruling for the CFTC would shield platforms from state-by-state bans but lock them into federal oversight. The docket entry for this petition and any CFTC response will be the first concrete signal of the Court's interest.
Ranked, source-checked, and verified by the desk's independent review pass.
Sources
Also reported by Cointelegraph. The desk cites only the pages it drew facts from; these outlets independently carried the same development.
More on CFTC
Other reporting from this desk on CFTC.
- CFTC staff warns prediction markets on mention contracts, cites insider-trading risk · September 23, 2026 · 7:12 PM ET
- CFTC Files Crypto Market Rulemaking With White House at Prerule Stage · September 19, 2026 · 7:13 PM ET
- SEC and CFTC pledge crypto rules without Congress after Clarity Act fails · September 16, 2026 · 8:34 PM ET
- Senate Fails Clarity Act Cloture Vote on September 15; Ethics Divide Kills Crypto Bill · September 15, 2026 · 3:32 PM ET